Royal families and monarchies had always excited people across the world. Stories that met public eye were usually lapped up with a mix of awe and even a tinge of envy by common people. Little did they know of the realities of what went behind the closed doors of palaces or castles.
‘The Crown’ is a drama series
that was released ten years ago in Netflix which portrayed British monarchy,
especially the era of Queen Elizabeth II. There are quite a lot of remarkable
episodes in the six-season series. While I was late to the party, I could not
help but be at awe at some of the moments that were beautifully captured.
For instance, ‘Marionattes’ the
fifth episode in season 2 of the series portrayed a sequence of how the Queen came
under criticism for being a puppet of her courtiers. This was followed by the
obvious rejection of criticism by the cynical monarch, an eventual twist of
tale based on a meeting unrecorded in the history, of an audience with the
critic by the Queen herself, and how the Queen made changes to her ways of
working that transformed the monarchy to a more effective and appealing entity to
the public.
The critic of the Queen was Lord
Altrincham, once a Lieutenant in British Army who later tried his hands in
politics and went on to become a historian and a journalist. If you can spare a
few minutes, I strongly recommend watching this episode and do not be surprised
if you draw an interesting parallel to the present-day corporate world.
It all started with Lord Altrincham
writing a critical observation about a speech made by the Queen at the Jaguar
factory in the year 1958. To set the context, this was immediately after a
crushing defeat for the British armed forces against Egypt and Russia during the
Suez Canal crisis, with UK losing its face and the military intervention severely
straining the exchequer. Britain was broke. That was when the Queen delivered
the speech that had statements which did not even acknowledge this reality and
instead demeaned the people of the nation.
Interestingly even before the
speech, an assistant private secretary tried to do a fact-check with the principal
private secretary of the Queen about the inappropriate wordings of the speech
the latter penned. But instead of trying to review, he denied it vehemently
stating the Queen trusted him. Indeed, that was what happened. The monarch trusted
her key personnel and delivered a mistake which people noticed, and one man stood
up and spoke.
What happened later was more
interesting. Initial reactions to the published article attracted a lot of wrath
from the public that Lord Altrincham even got slapped by a member of an extremist
group who supported monarchy. This was immediately after the critic was invited
to a TV show where he articulated his thoughts in a calm, yet firm manner. The common
public later acknowledged this and agreed with his views. Eventually Lord
Altrincham received an invitation from Buckingham Palace where he met the Queen
herself, though apparently not recorded in the history books. But the visit
itself created history due to the changes the world saw that were brought in at
the palace and for the monarchy itself!
Whether this incident
happened with all its amusement as depicted in the Netflix series, one thing is
certain. We see this drama unfolding in the modern-day corporate world as well with
certain leaders functioning like a monarch. They are surrounded by office courtiers
who feed all kind of incorrect realities to bosses who take decisions and
actions which are against the wellbeing of their staff. That is when the likes
of Lord Altrincham are born in organizations where people start raising their
concerns. The natural reaction from leaders is to suppress a rebellion. But,
blessed are those who decide to listen to those articulated revolutionaries and
change if necessary.
For all that matter, a change
proposed if implemented may even catapult the leadership to never-seen-before heights
and people will have renewed faith on their leaders and loyalties will be
restored with even more vigour.